|
|
How Can Reading Strategies Help Achieve the Reading Writing and Critical Thinking Outcomes in Basic Writing CoursesIn “The Argument of Reading,” David Bartholomae writes that the issue “is not whether or what students should read, but how” (245). In other words, the content is less important then the way in which a student read. Reading outcomes are closely linked to writing outcomes as students are generally asked to respond to a reading in some way. Different reading strategies can be used to achieve different reading and writing outcomes. Some possible questions:
This is a writing outcome — so what does it have to do with reading? Mariolina Salvatori writes “…the teaching of literature and composition are characterized by an artificial separation between the activities of reading and those of writing” (“Reading and Writing Text: Correlations between Reading and Writing Patterns” 657). She suggests in her article that they can and must be taught together.
How do you foster critical thinking? Many teachers struggle to find lessons and activities to foster critical thinking in their students. Sheridan Blau writes “[w]hile reading interpretation and criticism define the overt focus of instruction in the academic discipline of literature, they also analogously describe the sort of critical thinking that is required for responsible intellectual participation in most civic, economic and moral transactions and in virtually every academic discipline and learned profession” ( The Literature Workshop 204). A popular reading theory is “Reader Response.” But, Mariolina Salvatori, in a more recent article for College English in 1996, warns against this theory of reading. She states that an inexperienced reader should be discouraged from a reader response type of strategy as it may be “counterproductive” (443–4). She advocates for theories that explore help to give voice to a piece of writing. She wants readers to construct meaning through the interconnectedness of reading and writing (that virtual, provisional interaction between two extremely complex, invisible, imperceptible processes that can nevertheless be used to test and to foreground each other’s moves) test to be constructed as something either obvious or authorized […] (445).
Is there just one way to read? What is the important information that the students must consider when writing about what they have read. “Good readers distinguish between important information and details as they read…”(Mi-jeong Song “Teaching Reading Strategies in an Ongoing EFL University Reading Classroom”). How do they distinguish? Some will automatically create their own strategies but other must be taught to use them. Song’s research indicates that reading strategies, when taught to students, increases students’ level of understanding. There are many reading strategy books that can be helpful starting resources. “Literacy Strategies Across the Subject Areas offers teachers and students a flexible set of strategies that can help connect and support literacy learning within and across subject areas” (Karen D. Wood and D. Bruce Taylor). This book contains 24 strategies that can help your students achieve their reading and writing outcomes. References: Bartholomae, David. “The Argument of Reading.” Writing on the Margins: Essays on Composition and Writing. Boston: Bedford Press, 2005.
Blau, Sheridan D. The Literature Workshop: Teaching Texts and Their Readers. Portsmouth: Heinemann, 2003.
Salvatori, Mariolina. “Conversations with Texts: Reading in the Teaching of Composition.” College English 58, 4 (1996): 440–54.
Salvatori, Mariolina. “Reading and Writing a Text: Correlations between Reading and Writing Patterns.” College English 45, 7 (1983): 657–66.
Song, Mi-jeong. “Teaching Reading Strategies in an Ongoing EFL University Reading Classroom.” Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 8 (1998): 41–54.
Wood, Karen D., and D. Bruce Taylor. Literacy Strategies Across the Subject Areas. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson, 2006.
|